Case Study #1
Fair Is Not Always Equal, and Equal Is Not Always Fair
Background
The Smith family owned a $50M manufacturing business employing over 100 people. As retirement approached, founders David and Susan faced a difficult challenge: ensuring business sustainability while addressing the vastly different circumstances of their children:
-
Emma, the COO, had dedicated 12 years to the company and envisioned leading it into the future.
-
Jack, a visual artist uninvolved in the business, saw inheritance as a family right.
To navigate these complexities, they turned to Peter, their trusted Family Enterprise Advisor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenges
-
Valuation Disparities: The family’s wealth was largely tied to the business, with $40M in company assets and just $10M in personal assets, including the family home and cottages. Ensuring Jack’s fair share without diminishing Emma’s control of the business was a significant challenge.
-
Emotional Strain: Emma felt her 12 years of contributions warranted a majority stake, while Jack viewed inheritance as an equal entitlement.
-
Succession Complexity: Existing structures prioritized tax efficiency over family harmony, creating several issues:
-
The spousal trust left Mom in control of the business, rather than Emma.
-
Giving Jack shares risked straining Emma, who resented paying dividends to a non-contributor.
-
An all-business inheritance for Emma ($40M) made Jack’s share ($10M) seem inequitable.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution
Peter structured family meetings, fostering open dialogue and discussions that focused on understanding the difference between having a vote versus a voice. He crafted a tailored plan that balanced fairness with sustainability:
-
Family Trust and Estate Freeze: The creation of a family trust and an estate freeze ensured future business growth would accrue to the next generation, preserving equity and protecting assets from liabilities.
-
Emma’s Role: Emma received 75% equity in the business ($30M), securing operational control. A deferred buyout clause allowed her to gradually purchase Jack’s shares.
-
Jack’s Share: Jack received 25% equity ($10M) of the family business, $1.5M in other investments, $500K in cash, and $150K in annual dividends, providing liquidity and income.
-
Business Growth: Retaining $5M in earnings supported the company’s future expansion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
With Peter’s guidance, the Smith family reached a fair and practical solution:
-
Emma was empowered to lead the business with full operational control.
-
Jack’s inheritance provided $2M in liquid assets and a stable income stream, addressing his financial needs.
-
Open communication fostered trust, strengthening family relationships.
“With a clear plan in place, we’re confident our family and business will thrive together for generations.” – David and Susan Smith.
Case Study #2
The Family CFO
Background
The Green family owned a successful logistics company with $20 million in annual revenue. As founders Sarah and Paul prepared for retirement, they hoped to pass the business to their son Alex.
"It's great being successful, but it sure makes life complicated," Sarah remarked, reflecting on the complex structures—trusts, operating companies, holding companies—set up by their advisors over the years. “Its hard to know how these pieces fit together, especially now as we are focusing on succession and estate planning. I feel lost, and Paul knows even less. We need someone to take on this responsibility and bring everything together.”
The Greens turned to Peter, an experienced and trusted Family Enterprise Advisor, for help.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Challenges
-
Fragmented Communication: Sarah and Paul received inconsistent advice from multiple professionals, which created confusion about tax implications, legal structures, and financing options.
-
Lack of Oversight: There was no one person coordinating the family’s goals and ensuring alignment among all advisors.
-
Operational Demands: Running the business left Sarah and Paul with little time or energy to focus on the details of succession planning.
-
Unwanted Administrative Work: While the Greens were willing to participate in meetings, they did not want to manage the administrative tasks, like taking notes, following up, and ensuring critical details were not missed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution
A CFO for the family:
-
Peter stepped in to coordinate all meetings, ensuring the advice from accountants, lawyers, bankers, and investors was consistent and aligned with Sarah and Paul’s goals.
-
He managed a shared document repository, tracked tasks, and provided clear summaries to keep everyone on the same page.
-
Complex legal and financial jargon was translated into clear, actionable insight, allowing Sarah and Paul to understand the decisions being made.
-
Peter uncovered cost inefficiencies, such as replacing an unnecessary $28,000 annual audited financial report with a more appropriate $6,000 year-end accounting report. He also addressed critical gaps, like updating an outdated shareholder agreement to reflect Alex’s evolving role in the business.
-
Leveraging his experience with advisors nationwide, Peter identified potential challenges that Sarah and Paul hadn’t thought of and offered solutions inspired by how other families successfully navigated similar issues.
-
Peter focused on providing Alex with the same attention and care in tax and investment planning as his parents had received, addressing a previously neglected area. Sarah, Paul, and Alex all agreed that keeping Alex fully informed about the decisions being made, and ensuring he understood their immediate and long-term impact on his role in the family business, was an important aspect requiring attention.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Outcome
With Peter’s help, the Green family found their lives significantly organized and simplified. He took on the burdens of banking, investments, legal, tax, and accounting issues, allowing Sarah, Paul, and Alex to spend their time on what truly mattered to them. Free from administrative worries, they could focus on their personal interests and family life, knowing Peter ensured their financial and legal matters were handled efficiently and effectively.
"We were lost in a sea of advice from multiple professionals, but Peter brought clarity. He ensured everything aligned with our goals and made sure the succession went exactly as we hoped, without us having to do the heavy lifting." – Sarah and Paul Green